[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tepvopkizn4jezpqcbhwrcsnsrjacztv6kuv53hidcjbrnrs3c@pfcp45jarcoy>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:52:45 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
To: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Drew Fustini <drew@...7.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] pwm: Export `pwmchip_release` for external use
Hello Michal,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 08:54:28PM +0200, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index 8cafc483db53addf95591d1ac74287532c0fa0ee..8f0698c09e62b893d63fc258da3c34781183056f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ static inline bool pwm_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm)
>
> /* PWM provider APIs */
> void pwmchip_put(struct pwm_chip *chip);
> +void pwmchip_release(struct device *dev);
I want this in a separate section because "normal" provider don't need
that. Please add a comment that this is only public for technical
reasons for the Rust wrappers.
I understand you are eager to get this merged, but still I'd ask you to
slow down your patch sending frequency. Currently I tend to not apply it
for v6.17-rc1 as I'd like to have that in next for some time.
With you waiting a bit longer before v11 I would have written that in
reply to the explanation in the v10 thread and we might have saved
one iteration ...
> struct pwm_chip *pwmchip_alloc(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm, size_t sizeof_priv);
> struct pwm_chip *devm_pwmchip_alloc(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm, size_t sizeof_priv);
>
> @@ -551,6 +552,10 @@ static inline void pwmchip_put(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> {
> }
>
> +static inline void pwmchip_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +}
> +
Is this needed? There is no user of this function that doesn't depend
on CONFIG_PWM?!
> static inline struct pwm_chip *pwmchip_alloc(struct device *parent,
> unsigned int npwm,
> size_t sizeof_priv)
>
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists