[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250710091352.4ae01211@foz.lan>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:13:52 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa
<akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] docs: kdoc: Improve the output text accumulation
Em Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:41:19 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> escreveu:
> Em Wed, 2 Jul 2025 16:35:24 -0600
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:
>
> > Building strings with repeated concatenation is somewhat inefficient in
> > Python; it is better to make a list and glom them all together at the end.
> > Add a small set of methods to the OutputFormat superclass to manage the
> > output string, and use them throughout.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
>
> The patch looks good to me. Just a minor nit below.
>
> > ---
> > scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_output.py | 185 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_output.py b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_output.py
> > index ea8914537ba0..d4aabdaa9c51 100644
> > --- a/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_output.py
> > +++ b/scripts/lib/kdoc/kdoc_output.py
> > @@ -73,7 +73,19 @@ class OutputFormat:
> > self.config = None
> > self.no_doc_sections = False
> >
> > - self.data = ""
> > + #
> > + # Accumulation and management of the output text.
> > + #
> > + def reset_output(self):
> > + self._output = []
> > +
> > + def emit(self, text):
> > + """Add a string to out output text"""
> > + self._output.append(text)
> > +
> > + def output(self):
> > + """Obtain the accumulated output text"""
> > + return ''.join(self._output)
>
> I would prefer to use a more Pythonic name for this function:
>
> def __str__(self)
>
> This way, all it takes to get the final string is to use str():
>
> out_str = str(out)
>
> With that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Hmm... actually, I would code it on a different way, using something like:
class OutputString:
def __init__(self):
"""Initialize internal list"""
self._output = []
# Probably not needed - The code can simply do, instead:
# a = OutputString() to create a new string.
def reset(self):
"""Reset the output text"""
self._output = []
def __add__(self, text):
"""Add a string to out output text"""
if not isinstance(text, str):
raise TypeError("Can only append strings")
self._output.append(text)
return self
def __str__(self):
return ''.join(self._output)
# and, if needed, add a getter/setter:
@property
def data(self):
"""Getter for the current output"""
return ''.join(self._output)
@data.setter
def data(self, new_value):
if isinstance(new_value, str):
self._output = [new_value]
elif isinstance(new_value, list):
self._output = new_value
else:
raise TypeError("Value should be either list or string")
That would allow things like:
out = OutputString()
out = out + "Foo" + " " + "Bar"
print(out)
out = OutputString()
out += "Foo"
out += " "
out += "Bar"
return(str(out))
and won't require much changes at the output logic, and IMO will
provide a cleaner code.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists