[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DB87TX9Y5018.N1WDM8XRN74K@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:01:05 +0200
From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>
To: "Alistair Popple" <apopple@...dia.com>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Bjorn Helgaas"
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Krzysztof Wilczyński
<kwilczynski@...nel.org>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor"
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo"
<gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Alexandre
Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: Update PCI binding safety comments and add
inline compiler hint
On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 4:24 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote:
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/pci.rs b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> index 8435f8132e38..5c35a66a5251 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> @@ -371,14 +371,18 @@ fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut bindings::pci_dev {
>
> impl Device {
> /// Returns the PCI vendor ID.
> + #[inline]
> pub fn vendor_id(&self) -> u16 {
> - // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> + // SAFETY: by its type invariant `self.as_raw` is always a valid pointer to a
s/by its type invariant/by the type invariants of `Self`,/
s/always//
Also, which invariant does this refer to? The only one that I can see
is:
/// A [`Device`] instance represents a valid `struct device` created by the C portion of the kernel.
And this doesn't say anything about the validity of `self.as_raw()`...
> + // `struct pci_dev`.
> unsafe { (*self.as_raw()).vendor }
> }
>
> /// Returns the PCI device ID.
> + #[inline]
> pub fn device_id(&self) -> u16 {
> - // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> + // SAFETY: by its type invariant `self.as_raw` is always a valid pointer to a
> + // `struct pci_dev`.
Ditto here.
---
Cheers,
Benno
> unsafe { (*self.as_raw()).device }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists