lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG92TxxIRdRES5cs@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:14:07 +0000
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...ux.dev>
Cc: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] media: i2c: ov9282: add led_mode v4l2 control

Hi Richard,

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 08:50:24AM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> 
> thanks for the feedback :)
> 
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 09:12:57PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> > 
> > Thanks for the update.
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 09:31:40AM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote:
> > > Add V4L2_CID_FLASH_LED_MODE support using the "strobe output enable"
> > > feature of the sensor. This implements following modes:
> > > 
> > >  - V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_NONE, which disables the strobe output
> > >  - V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_FLASH, which enables the strobe output
> > 
> > I really think you should use a different control for this. The sensor can
> > strobe the flash but it won't control its mode.
> > 
> > How about calling it V4L2_FLASH_STROBE_ENABLE?
> 
> I agree on that. But tbh V4L2_FLASH_STROBE_ENABLE somehow sounds wrong
> to me. As the strobe output in the ov9282 case goes high for the strobe
> duration, what do you think about calling it V4L2_FLASH_STROBE_PULSE?

That's how the hardware strobe is supposed to work, there's nothing unusual
in that. How about V4L2_FLASH_HW_STROBE_ENABLE?

> Or should it be V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_STROBE_PULSE?
> 
> Regarding disabling the strobe output: Is sticking with V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_NONE
> fine? Or do you prefer an additional V4L2_FLASH_(MODE_)STROBE_DISABLE
> or something similar?

This isn't about the LED flash mode and we shouldn't suggest it is.

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ