[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG-CE0jUxK4k1FMb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:04:19 +0000
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, kevin.tian@...el.com,
corbet@....net, will@...nel.org, bagasdotme@...il.com,
robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, shuah@...nel.org,
jsnitsel@...hat.com, nathan@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
yi.l.liu@...el.com, mshavit@...gle.com, zhangzekun11@...wei.com,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, mochs@...dia.com, alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com,
vasant.hegde@....com, dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 27/28] iommu/tegra241-cmdqv: Add user-space use support
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 09:50:12AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:48:42PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
>
> > Ahh, thanks for this, that saved a lot of my time! And yes, I see some
> > functions in eventq.c calling the iopf_group_response which settles the
> > CMD_RESUME. So.. I assume these resume commands would be trapped and
> > *actually* executed through this or a similar path for vPRI.
>
> Yes, that is what Intel did. PRI has to be tracked in the kernel
> because we have to ack requests eventually. If the VMM crashes the
> kernel has to ack everything and try to clean up.
>
I see.. thanks for clarifying!
> Also SMMUv3 does not support PRI today, just stall.
>
Ack. Thanks!
> Jason
Praan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists