[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250710093957.GE1431498@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:39:57 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mfd: tps6594: Add TI TPS652G1 support
On Thu, 03 Jul 2025, Michael Walle wrote:
> Add support for the TI TPS652G1 PMIC which is a stripped down
> version of the TPS65224. Support for the latter has already been
> merged. Refactor the regulator driver to ease adding new devices.
> After doing that adding the TPS652G1 variant is really straight
> forward. Some care has to be taken by the interrupt handling (of the
> regulator part) because there interrupts are used for voltage
> monitoring which this variant doesn't have.
>
> As there are conflicts in the regulator tree (some constify
> patches) and my patches make use of them, only the first two (or
> four, that's up to Lee) can go through the MFD tree. Lee, could
> you please provide an immutable tag for the other trees to merge?
>
> v3:
> - (re)add dt binding patch that I've accidentally missed in v2
Ah, that explains it!
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists