[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYti-72RmdttPNsSzBAxVyt-Oci37mOwCE=YGUR83hEa6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:08:48 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Ben Copeland <benjamin.copeland@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: next-20250702 WARNING iommu io-pgtable-arm.c at
arm_lpae_map_pages qcom_iommu_map
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 21:56, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 04:14:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > I have tested this patch on top of Linux next-20250702 tag,
> > and found kernel warning,
>
> Oh, yeah, I guess that hacky fix is not going to work.
>
> Then this is probably good enough (against linux-next):
>
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static struct iommu_domain *qcom_iommu_domain_alloc_paging(struct device *dev)
>
> mutex_init(&qcom_domain->init_mutex);
> spin_lock_init(&qcom_domain->pgtbl_lock);
> - qcom_domain->domain.pgsize_bitmap = SZ_4K | SZ_64K | SZ_1M | SZ_16M;
> + qcom_domain->domain.pgsize_bitmap = SZ_4K | SZ_2M;
>
> return &qcom_domain->domain;
> }
I have tested the above patch and it fixes the reported issue.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
* https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/8351756#L2565
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists