linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: xilinx: Fix block comment style and minor cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <175214601648.738213.2181786988530151709.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 12:13:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: michal.simek@....com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
 Darshan Rathod <darshanrathod475@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: xilinx: Fix block comment style and minor
 cleanups

On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 04:50:57 +0000, Darshan Rathod wrote:
> This patch fixes block comment style issues and minor code cleanups as reported by checkpatch.pl.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: xilinx: Fix block comment style and minor cleanups
      commit: 469d7ea8e99124e4def5d98f928ffb4a659aa1c8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark