lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250711-fascinating-dramatic-mongrel-06bb3d@l-nschier-aarch64>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:13:29 +0200
From: Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Shivank Garg <shivankg@....com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the
> module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules
> only. It would be possible to resrict it technically, but it was pointed

s/resrict/restrict/

> out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an in-tree
> module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those also
> have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aFleJN_fE-RbSoFD@infradead.org/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNATRkZHwJGpojCnvdiaoDnP%2BaeUXgdey5sb_8muzdWTMkA@mail.gmail.com/ [2]
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@....com>
> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---

Looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Nicolas Schier <n.schier@....de>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ