[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aHEmJvhUVG_x1FZx@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 15:56:38 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, vschneid@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: preempt: Move dynamic keys into kernel/sched
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 01:23:44PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Dynamic preemption can be static key or static call based.
> Static key is used to check kernel preemption depending on
> the current preemption model. i.e enable for lazy, full.
>
> Code is spread currently across entry/common.c, arm64 and latest being
> powerpc. There is little arch specific to it. For example, arm64,
> powerpc does the same thing. It is better to move it into kernel/sched
> since preemption is more closely associated with scheduler.
>
> Plus, Any new arch that wants dynamic preemption enabled need to have
> only HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY.
>
> This is more of code movement. No functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 1 -
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 8 --------
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/preempt.h | 16 ----------------
> arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c | 4 ----
> include/linux/entry-common.h | 1 -
> include/linux/sched.h | 8 ++++++++
> kernel/entry/common.c | 1 -
> kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++++
> 8 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/preempt.h
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists