linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250711161732.384-10-will@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 17:17:31 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess()

__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() is unnecessarily complicated:

  - It takes a 'start', 'end' and 'pages' argument, whereas it only
    needs 'pages' (which the caller has computed from the other two
    arguments!).

  - It erroneously compares 'pages' with MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES when
    the system doesn't support range-based invalidation but the range to
    be invalidated would result in fewer than MAX_DVM_OPS invalidations.

Simplify the function so that it no longer takes the 'start' and 'end'
arguments and only considers the MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES threshold on
systems that implement range-based invalidation.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 20 ++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 8618a85d5cd3..2541863721af 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -470,21 +470,13 @@ do {									\
 #define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \
 	__flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
 
-static inline bool __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(unsigned long start,
-		unsigned long end, unsigned long pages, unsigned long stride)
+static inline bool __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(unsigned long pages,
+						  unsigned long stride)
 {
-	/*
-	 * When the system does not support TLB range based flush
-	 * operation, (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages can be handled. But
-	 * with TLB range based operation, MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES
-	 * pages can be handled.
-	 */
-	if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
-	     (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
-	    pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES)
+	if (system_supports_tlb_range() && pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES)
 		return true;
 
-	return false;
+	return pages >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 }
 
 static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -498,7 +490,7 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	end = round_up(end, stride);
 	pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-	if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(start, end, pages, stride)) {
+	if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(pages, stride)) {
 		flush_tlb_mm(mm);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -547,7 +539,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end
 	end = round_up(end, stride);
 	pages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-	if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(start, end, pages, stride)) {
+	if (__flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(pages, stride)) {
 		flush_tlb_all();
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog