linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: proximity: isl29501: use scan struct instead of array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHE_iq0G6pYMIvRb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 19:44:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: proximity: isl29501: use scan struct instead of
 array

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:18:13AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Replace the scan buffer array with a struct that contains a single u32
> for the data and an aligned_s64 for the timestamp. This makes it easier
> to see the intended layout of the buffer and avoids the need to manually
> calculate the number of extra elements needed for an aligned timestamp.

Same Q, why not macro?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko