[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025071104-amnesty-flashback-b883@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:24:37 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
tech-board-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] unwind: Export unwind_user symbol to GPL modules
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 01:32:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > So get the lttng code merged into the tree please, it seems that you are
> > the one objecting to the merge, not me :)
>
> It was actually others, and it was years ago. Perhaps we could just
> accept the LTTng kernel module as is, as a module, and leave it at that?
That's up to the maintainers of the subsystem where it would be, not me.
And that would solve this problem, so I do recommend it :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists