linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for v6.16-rc6 (follow up)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjb_8B85uKhr1xuQSei_85u=UzejphRGk2QFiByP+8Brw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 11:54:14 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for v6.16-rc6 (follow up)

On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 11:46, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hm. I'm definitely okay with reverting. So if you revert these three:
>
> a3c4a125ec72 ("netlink: Fix rmem check in netlink_broadcast_deliver().")
> a3c4a125ec72 ("netlink: Fix rmem check in netlink_broadcast_deliver().")
> ae8f160e7eb2 ("netlink: Fix wraparounds of sk->sk_rmem_alloc.")
>
> everything is just fine?

I'm assuming you mean

  a215b5723922 netlink: make sure we allow at least one dump skb
  a3c4a125ec72 netlink: Fix rmem check in netlink_broadcast_deliver().
  ae8f160e7eb2 netlink: Fix wraparounds of sk->sk_rmem_alloc.

Will do more testing.

             Linus