[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c6db237-3d64-43f5-8a20-168be5b248c8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 21:14:50 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, mjguzik@...il.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, willy@...radead.org, raghavendra.kt@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/14] mm: add config option for clearing page-extents
On 11.07.25 19:25, Ankur Arora wrote:
>
> David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
>
>> On 10.07.25 02:59, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>> Add CONFIG_CLEAR_PAGE_EXTENT to allow clearing of page-extents
>>> where architecturally supported.
>>> This is only available with !CONFIG_HIGHMEM because the intent is to
>>> use architecture support to clear contiguous extents in a single
>>> operation (ex. via FEAT_MOPS on arm64, string instructions on x86)
>>> which excludes any possibility of interspersing kmap()/kunmap().
>>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>>> index 781be3240e21..a74a5e02de28 100644
>>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -910,6 +910,15 @@ config NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT
>>> endif # TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>> +config CLEAR_PAGE_EXTENT
>>> + def_bool y
>>> + depends on !HIGHMEM && ARCH_HAS_CLEAR_PAGES
>>> + depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || HUGETLBFS
>>> +
>>> + help
>>> + Use architectural support for clear_pages() to zero page-extents.
>>> + This is likely to be faster than zeroing page-at-a-time.
>>> +
>>
>> IIRC, adding a help text will make this option be configurable by the user, no?
>
> I tried changing the value in the generated .config by hand and that
> reverted back to the computed value. So, I think this isn't configurable
> by the user.
Yes, I misremembered and the help text confused me.
So yes, the help text in that case (internal entries) is uncommon (no
need to guide the user when there are no options :) ), but feel free to
keep it for documentation purposes.
(e.g., HAVE_64BIT_ALIGNED_ACCESS does that)
Maybe we should call it similarly HAVE_... to make it clearer that there
are really no options.
But I'm bad at #kconfig, so whatever you prefer.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists