linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v5 6/7] sprintf: Add [v]sprintf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <327bas45h6nu7jsrod2qnekijq4xrztddzb4wbl7avkquwvwrs@xpwtrozq5o6z>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 21:21:56 +0200
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, 
	Christopher Bazley <chris.bazley.wg14@...il.com>, shadow <~hallyn/shadow@...ts.sr.ht>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, 
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, 
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, 
	Andrew Clayton <andrew@...ital-domain.net>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Martin Uecker <uecker@...raz.at>, Sam James <sam@...too.org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 6/7] sprintf: Add [v]sprintf_array()

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:17:28PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 06:43:43PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 01:23:49 +0200
> > Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Linus,
> > > 
> > > [I'll reply to both of your emails at once]
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 02:58:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > You took my suggestion, and then you messed it up.
> > > > 
> > > > Your version of sprintf_array() is broken. It evaluates 'a' twice.
> > > > Because unlike ARRAY_SIZE(), your broken ENDOF() macro evaluates the
> > > > argument.  
> > > 
> > > An array has no issue being evaluated twice (unless it's a VLA).  On the
> > > other hand, I agree it's better to not do that in the first place.
> > > My bad for forgetting about it.  Sorry.
> > 
> > Or a function that returns an array...
> 
> Actually, I was forgetting that the array could be gotten from a pointer
> to array:
> 
> 	int (*ap)[42] = ...;
> 
> 	ENDOF(ap++);  // Evaluates ap++

D'oh!  That should have been ENDOF(*ap++).

> Anyway, fixed in v6.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Alex
> 
> -- 
> <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>



-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)