[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aHGMUxA8w3-ixLeA@tardis-2.local>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 15:12:35 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Vicentiu Galanopulo <vicentiu.galanopulo@...ote-tech.co.uk>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Han Xu <han.xu@....com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] locking/mutex: Mark devm_mutex_init() as
__must_check
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> devm_mutex_init() can fail. Make sure everybody checks the return value.
> All patches should go through the mutex tree together.
>
> It would be great if this could go in through a single tree at once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Queued for v6.17, thank you all!
Regards,
Boqun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists