linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] panic: Fix compilation error (`make W=1`)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHCy2Tv0zmhklKdo@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:44:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] panic: Fix compilation error (`make W=1`)

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:04:29AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:48:29AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 06:49:47PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

...

> > We can even move the SYS_INFO_MAX_LEN definition close to si_names[],
> 
> Agree.
> 
> > initially sys_info_avail[] was next to si_names[], and was moved inside
> > "#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL" region for compiling CONFIG_SYSCTL=n case.
> 
> But let me think a bit, perhaps we can come up with something even better.

Okay, guys, I have a better approach found. Let me mock up a patch series
for that (we need one prerequisite).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko