[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250711004208.GA40145@system.software.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:42:08 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
asml.silence@...il.com, toke@...hat.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
vishal.moola@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com,
jackmanb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/8] Split netmem from struct page
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 11:35:33AM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:28 AM Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The MM subsystem is trying to reduce struct page to a single pointer.
> > See the following link for your information:
> >
> > https://kernelnewbies.org/MatthewWilcox/Memdescs/Path
> >
> > The first step towards that is splitting struct page by its individual
> > users, as has already been done with folio and slab. This patchset does
> > that for page pool.
> >
> > Matthew Wilcox tried and stopped the same work, you can see in:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230111042214.907030-1-willy@infradead.org/
> >
> > I focused on removing the page pool members in struct page this time,
> > not moving the allocation code of page pool from net to mm. It can be
> > done later if needed.
> >
> > The final patch removing the page pool fields will be posted once all
> > the converting of page to netmem are done:
> >
> > 1. converting use of the pp fields in struct page in prueth_swdata.
> > 2. converting use of the pp fields in struct page in freescale driver.
> >
> > For our discussion, I'm sharing what the final patch looks like, in this
> > cover letter.
> >
> > Byungchul
> > --8<--
> > commit 1847d9890f798456b21ccb27aac7545303048492
> > Author: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> > Date: Wed May 28 20:44:55 2025 +0900
> >
> > mm, netmem: remove the page pool members in struct page
> >
> > Now that all the users of the page pool members in struct page have been
> > gone, the members can be removed from struct page.
> >
> > However, since struct netmem_desc still uses the space in struct page,
> > the important offsets should be checked properly, until struct
> > netmem_desc has its own instance from slab.
> >
> > Remove the page pool members in struct page and modify static checkers
> > for the offsets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > index 32ba5126e221..db2fe0d0ebbf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > @@ -120,17 +120,6 @@ struct page {
> > */
> > unsigned long private;
> > };
> > - struct { /* page_pool used by netstack */
> > - /**
> > - * @pp_magic: magic value to avoid recycling non
> > - * page_pool allocated pages.
> > - */
> > - unsigned long pp_magic;
> > - struct page_pool *pp;
> > - unsigned long _pp_mapping_pad;
> > - unsigned long dma_addr;
> > - atomic_long_t pp_ref_count;
> > - };
> > struct { /* Tail pages of compound page */
> > unsigned long compound_head; /* Bit zero is set */
> > };
> > diff --git a/include/net/netmem.h b/include/net/netmem.h
> > index 8f354ae7d5c3..3414f184d018 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netmem.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netmem.h
> > @@ -42,11 +42,8 @@ struct netmem_desc {
> > static_assert(offsetof(struct page, pg) == \
> > offsetof(struct netmem_desc, desc))
> > NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(flags, _flags);
> > -NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp_magic, pp_magic);
> > -NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp, pp);
> > -NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(_pp_mapping_pad, _pp_mapping_pad);
> > -NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(dma_addr, dma_addr);
> > -NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(pp_ref_count, pp_ref_count);
> > +NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(lru, pp_magic);
> > +NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET(mapping, _pp_mapping_pad);
> > #undef NETMEM_DESC_ASSERT_OFFSET
> >
> > /*
>
>
> Can you remove the above patch/diff from the cover letter?
I added the diff for those who might get lost due to the lack of the
final patch. However, sure, I will remove it.
Byungchul
> --
> Thanks,
> Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists