[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250711-invisible-dainty-jackrabbit-acbf8f@krzk-bin>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:48:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 wireless-next 7/7] dt-bindings: net: wireless: rt2800:
add
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 03:40:30PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:40 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/07/2025 22:08, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > Add device-tree bindings for the RT2800 SOC wifi device found in older
> > > Ralink/Mediatek devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..8c13b25bd8b4
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2800.yaml
> >
> > Filename should match compatible. You were already changing something
> > here...
> hrm? that makes no sense. Various drivers have multiple compatible lines.
Luckily we do not speak about drivers here. Anyway, follow standard
review practices, you don't get special rules.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists