lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9nqyLJrqPYDJme2tFDY9HJNyg-x8LA0HPY653rCN7EkbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 05:27:11 -0400
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the driver-core tree

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 4:04 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rust tree got a conflict in:
>
>   rust/kernel/platform.rs
>
> between commit:
>
>   f0a68a912c67 ("rust: platform: use generic device drvdata accessors")
>
> from the driver-core tree and commit:
>
>   fcad9bbf9e1a ("rust: enable `clippy::ptr_as_ptr` lint")
>
> from the rust tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the former) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

The former version looks correct as it removed the line modified by
the latter version.

Thank you Stephen.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ