linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 22/29] iommufd/selftest: Update hw_info coverage for an input data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHDf6w1gFcNKNtGc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:56:59 +0000
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, kevin.tian@...el.com,
	corbet@....net, bagasdotme@...il.com, will@...nel.org,
	robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
	vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, shuah@...nel.org,
	jsnitsel@...hat.com, nathan@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	yi.l.liu@...el.com, mshavit@...gle.com, zhangzekun11@...wei.com,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, mochs@...dia.com, alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com,
	vasant.hegde@....com, dwmw2@...radead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 22/29] iommufd/selftest: Update hw_info coverage for
 an input data_type

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 02:12:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 04:43:14PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:32:02PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Alright, this was on the `for-next` branch when the head was at:
> > 3e2a9811f6a9cefd310cc33cab73d5435b4a4caa
> > iommufd: Apply the new iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd helper
> > 
> > But I see that on `for-rc` [1] the fixes are merged.
> 
> Yes, Linus discourages back merging rc without a going forward
> justification, like following patches need the rc patches. Fixes some
> bug is not a justification...
> 

Ack. Thanks for the clarifying!

> Jason

Praan