linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix up build issues with vpanic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250711112844.GG1099709@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 13:28:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix up build issues with vpanic

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 01:20:41PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The newly introduced vpanic() has some build issues. This series fix them
> up.
> 
> As the vpanic() is only in ftrace tree for now, it is probably best to let
> this series goes to ftrace tree, if everyone is okay with that.

Does it make sense to make panic a static inline?