[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a50fd8af9d21aade901fe4d32e14e698378c82f.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:09:12 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker
<frederic@...nel.org>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Alexander
Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sebastian Andrzej
Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, Martin
Karsten <mkarsten@...terloo.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem
On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 11:58 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 05:48:56PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > Sadly, still no luck.
>
> That's unfortunate.
>
> I'm still unable to reproduce the issue, so all I can do is staring at the
> code and guessing. But I'm out of idea for now.
Same as I. I tried to reproduce in a VM running Fedora Rawhide but
failed.
> This one is going to be hard to figure out..
And I'm afraid this may be a bug in my userspace... Then I'd feel guilty
if this is reverted because of an invalid bug report from I :(.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists