[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qay63njqf7z7mchizt5sm66i67rvxxxicikxmfuvllmmxfy7ek@mulnjvde5q7w>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 15:05:28 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_vpernami@...cinc.com, quic_mrana@...cinc.com,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] PCI/ASPM: Clear aspm_disable as part of
__pci_enable_link_state()
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 06:00:13PM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:38:48PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -1826,8 +1826,8 @@ static inline int pcie_set_target_speed(struct pci_dev *port,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> > int pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> > int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> > -int pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
>
> AFAICT there's no caller of this at all. Why do we keep it?
>
I'm just working on a series to convert the ath{10/11/12}k drivers to use this
API instead of modifying LNKCTL register directly:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c#n961
> > -int pci_enable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
>
> We only have two callers of this (pcie-qcom.c and vmd.c, both in
> drivers/pci/), so it's not clear to me that it needs to be in
> include/linux/pci.h.
>
> I'm a little dubious about it in the first place since I don't think
> drivers should be enabling ASPM states on their own, but pcie-qcom.c
> and vmd.c are PCIe controller drivers, not PCI device drivers, so I
> guess we can live with them for now.
>
> IMO the "someday" goal should be that we get rid of aspm_policy and
> enable all the available power saving states by default. We have
> sysfs knobs that administrators can use if necessary, and drivers or
> quirks can disable states if they need to work around hardware
> defects.
>
Yeah, I think the default should be powersave and let the users disable it for
performance if they want.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists