[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250712101418.GD9845@wp.pl>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 12:14:18 +0200
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 wireless-next 3/7] wifi: rt2800soc: allow loading from
OF
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 01:08:16PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Add a single binding to help the already present dts files load the
> driver. More are possible but there doesn't seem to be a significant
> difference between them to justify this.
>
> Use wifi name per dtschema requirements.
>
> The data field will be used to remove the custom non static probe
> function and use of_device_get_match_data.
>
> Added OF dependency to SOC CONFIG as adding of_match_table without OF
> being present makes no sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800soc.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/Kconfig
> index 3a32ceead54f..a0dc9a751234 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/Kconfig
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ endif
>
> config RT2800SOC
> tristate "Ralink WiSoC support"
> - depends on SOC_RT288X || SOC_RT305X || SOC_MT7620 || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on OF && (SOC_RT288X || SOC_RT305X || SOC_MT7620 || COMPILE_TEST)
> select RT2X00_LIB_SOC
> select RT2X00_LIB_MMIO
> select RT2X00_LIB_CRYPTO
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800soc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800soc.c
> index e73394cf6ea6..db8d01f0cdc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800soc.c
> @@ -243,9 +243,16 @@ static int rt2800soc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return rt2x00soc_probe(pdev, &rt2800soc_ops);
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id rt2880_wmac_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ralink,rt2880-wifi", .data = &rt2800soc_ops },
Why do .data = rt2800soc_ops here and use it via of_device_get_match_data()
in patch 5, insead of just use rt2800soc_ops directly in rt2800soc_probe ?
Regards
Stanislaw
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rt2880_wmac_match);
> +
> static struct platform_driver rt2800soc_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "rt2800_wmac",
> + .of_match_table = rt2880_wmac_match,
> },
> .probe = rt2800soc_probe,
> .remove = rt2x00soc_remove,
> --
> 2.50.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists