[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd9728b1-2710-46b1-a063-6a3204efee45@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 13:05:37 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
kuba@...nel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com,
hawk@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, toke@...hat.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
horms@...nel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
vishal.moola@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com,
jackmanb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/8] netmem: introduce utility APIs to use
struct netmem_desc
On 7/10/25 19:11, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:28 AM Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
>>
>> To eliminate the use of the page pool fields in struct page, the page
>> pool code should use netmem descriptor and APIs instead.
>>
>> However, some code e.g. __netmem_to_page() is still used to access the
>> page pool fields e.g. ->pp via struct page, which should be changed so
>> as to access them via netmem descriptor, struct netmem_desc instead,
>> since the fields no longer will be available in struct page.
>>
>> Introduce utility APIs to make them easy to use struct netmem_desc as
>> descriptor. The APIs are:
>>
>> 1. __netmem_to_nmdesc(), to convert netmem_ref to struct netmem_desc,
>> but unsafely without checking if it's net_iov or system memory.
>>
>> 2. netmem_to_nmdesc(), to convert netmem_ref to struct netmem_desc,
>> safely with checking if it's net_iov or system memory.
>>
>> 3. nmdesc_to_page(), to convert struct netmem_desc to struct page,
>> assuming struct netmem_desc overlays on struct page.
>>
>> 4. page_to_nmdesc(), to convert struct page to struct netmem_desc,
>> assuming struct netmem_desc overlays on struct page, allowing only
>> head page to be converted.
>>
>> 5. nmdesc_adress(), to get its virtual address corresponding to the
>> struct netmem_desc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
>> ---
>> include/net/netmem.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/netmem.h b/include/net/netmem.h
>> index 535cf17b9134..ad9444be229a 100644
>> --- a/include/net/netmem.h
>> +++ b/include/net/netmem.h
>> @@ -198,6 +198,32 @@ static inline struct page *netmem_to_page(netmem_ref netmem)
>> return __netmem_to_page(netmem);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * __netmem_to_nmdesc - unsafely get pointer to the &netmem_desc backing
>> + * @netmem
>> + * @netmem: netmem reference to convert
>> + *
>> + * Unsafe version of netmem_to_nmdesc(). When @netmem is always backed
>> + * by system memory, performs faster and generates smaller object code
>> + * (no check for the LSB, no WARN). When @netmem points to IOV, provokes
>> + * undefined behaviour.
>> + *
>> + * Return: pointer to the &netmem_desc (garbage if @netmem is not backed
>> + * by system memory).
>> + */
>> +static inline struct netmem_desc *__netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem_ref netmem)
>> +{
>> + return (__force struct netmem_desc *)netmem;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Does a netmem_desc represent the pp fields shared between struct page
> and struct net_iov, or does netmem_desc represent paged kernel memory?
> If the former, I don't think we need a safe and unsafe version of this
> helper, since netmem_ref always has netmem_desc fields underneath. If
> the latter, then this helper should not exist at all. We should not
> allow casting netmem_ref to a netmem_desc without first checking if
> it's a net_iov.
+1, and...
>
> To be honest the cover letter should come up with a detailed
> explanation of (a) what are the current types (b) what are the new
> types (c) what are the relationships between the types, so these
> questions stop coming up.
>
>> +static inline struct netmem_desc *netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem_ref netmem)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(netmem_is_net_iov(netmem)))
>> + return NULL;
... specifically this function should work with net_iov.
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists