[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACw3F509B=AHhpaTcuH9O851rrDdHh1baC8uRYy7bDa7BSMhgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:59:11 -0700
From: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: maz@...nel.org, joey.gouly@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
yuzenghui@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net, shuah@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, duenwen@...gle.com, rananta@...gle.com,
jthoughton@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: VM exit to userspace to handle SEA
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 12:40 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Jiaqi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:08:56AM +0000, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> > When APEI fails to handle a stage-2 synchronous external abort (SEA),
> > today KVM directly injects an async SError to the VCPU then resumes it,
> > which usually results in unpleasant guest kernel panic.
> >
> > One major situation of guest SEA is when vCPU consumes recoverable
> > uncorrected memory error (UER). Although SError and guest kernel panic
> > effectively stops the propagation of corrupted memory, there is room
> > to recover from an UER in a more graceful manner.
> >
> > Alternatively KVM can redirect the synchronous SEA event to VMM to
> > - Reduce blast radius if possible. VMM can inject a SEA to VCPU via
> > KVM's existing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS API. If the memory poison
> > consumption or fault is not from guest kernel, blast radius can be
> > limited to the triggering thread in guest userspace, so VM can
> > keep running.
> > - VMM can protect from future memory poison consumption by unmapping
> > the page from stage-2, or interrupt guest of the poisoned guest page
> > so guest kernel can unmap it from stage-1.
> > - VMM can also track SEA events that VM customers care about, restart
> > VM when certain number of distinct poison events have happened,
> > provide observability to customers in log management UI.
> >
> > Introduce an userspace-visible feature to enable VMM to handle SEA:
> > - KVM_CAP_ARM_SEA_TO_USER. As the alternative fallback behavior
> > when host APEI fails to claim a SEA, userspace can opt in this new
> > capability to let KVM exit to userspace during SEA if it is not
> > caused by access on memory of stage-2 translation table.
> > - KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA. A new exit reason is introduced for this.
> > KVM fills kvm_run.arm_sea with as much as possible information about
> > the SEA, enabling VMM to emulate SEA to guest by itself.
> > - Sanitized ESR_EL2. The general rule is to keep only the bits
> > useful for userspace and relevant to guest memory. See code
> > comments for why bits are hidden/reported.
> > - If faulting guest virtual and physical addresses are available.
> > - Faulting guest virtual address if available.
> > - Faulting guest physical address if available.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
>
> I was reviewing this locally and wound up making enough changes where it
> just made more sense to share the diff. General comments:
Thanks for the diff, Oliver! I will work on a v3 based on it.
>
> - Avoid adding helpers to headers when they're used in a single
> callsite / compilation unit
>
> - Add some detail about FEAT_RAS where we may still exit to userspace
> for host-controlled memory, as we cannot differentiate between a
> stage-1 or stage-2 TTW SEA when taken on the descriptor PA
Ah, IIUC, you are saying even if the FSC code tells fault is on TTW
(esr_fsc_is_secc_ttw or esr_fsc_is_sea_ttw), it can either be guest
stage-1's or stage-2's descriptor PA, and we can tell which from
which.
However, if ESR_ELx_S1PTW is set, we can tell this is a sub-case of
stage-2 descriptor PA, their usage is for stage-1 PTW but they are
stage-2 memory.
Is my current understanding right?
>
> - Explicitly handle SEAs due to VNCR (I have a separate prereq patch)
>
> From aac0bb8f90c43b5b17c3b4e50379cb8ca828812c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 05:08:56 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: VM exit to userspace to handle SEA
>
> When APEI fails to handle a stage-2 synchronous external abort (SEA),
> today KVM directly injects an async SError to the VCPU then resumes it,
> which usually results in unpleasant guest kernel panic.
>
> One major situation of guest SEA is when vCPU consumes recoverable
> uncorrected memory error (UER). Although SError and guest kernel panic
> effectively stops the propagation of corrupted memory, there is room
> to recover from an UER in a more graceful manner.
>
> Alternatively KVM can redirect the synchronous SEA event to VMM to
> - Reduce blast radius if possible. VMM can inject a SEA to VCPU via
> KVM's existing KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS API. If the memory poison
> consumption or fault is not from guest kernel, blast radius can be
> limited to the triggering thread in guest userspace, so VM can
> keep running.
> - VMM can protect from future memory poison consumption by unmapping
> the page from stage-2, or interrupt guest of the poisoned guest page
> so guest kernel can unmap it from stage-1.
> - VMM can also track SEA events that VM customers care about, restart
> VM when certain number of distinct poison events have happened,
> provide observability to customers in log management UI.
>
> Introduce an userspace-visible feature to enable VMM to handle SEA:
> - KVM_CAP_ARM_SEA_TO_USER. As the alternative fallback behavior
> when host APEI fails to claim a SEA, userspace can opt in this new
> capability to let KVM exit to userspace during SEA if it is not
> caused by access on memory of stage-2 translation table.
> - KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA. A new exit reason is introduced for this.
> KVM fills kvm_run.arm_sea with as much as possible information about
> the SEA, enabling VMM to emulate SEA to guest by itself.
> - Sanitized ESR_EL2. The general rule is to keep only the bits
> useful for userspace and relevant to guest memory. See code
> comments for why bits are hidden/reported.
> - If faulting guest virtual and physical addresses are available.
> - Faulting guest virtual address if available.
> - Faulting guest physical address if available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250604050902.3944054-2-jiaqiyan@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 5 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 10 +++++
> 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e54d29feb469..98ce2d58ac8d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_GUEST_HAS_SVE 9
> /* MIDR_EL1, REVIDR_EL1, and AIDR_EL1 are writable from userspace */
> #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_WRITABLE_IMP_ID_REGS 10
> + /* Unhandled SEAs are taken to userspace */
> +#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EXIT_SEA 11
> unsigned long flags;
>
> /* VM-wide vCPU feature set */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 7a1a8210ff91..aec6034db1e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
> }
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> break;
> + case KVM_CAP_ARM_SEA_TO_USER:
> + r = 0;
> + set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EXIT_SEA, &kvm->arch.flags);
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -322,6 +326,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
> case KVM_CAP_COUNTER_OFFSET:
> case KVM_CAP_ARM_WRITABLE_IMP_ID_REGS:
> + case KVM_CAP_ARM_SEA_TO_USER:
> r = 1;
> break;
> case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG2:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index a34924d75069..26b2e71994be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1813,8 +1813,48 @@ static void handle_access_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Returns true if the SEA should be handled locally within KVM if the abort is
> + * caused by a kernel memory allocation (e.g. stage-2 table memory).
> + */
> +static bool host_owns_sea(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Without FEAT_RAS HCR_EL2.TEA is RES0, meaning any external abort
> + * taken from a guest EL to EL2 is due to a host-imposed access (e.g.
> + * stage-2 PTW).
> + */
> + if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN))
> + return true;
> +
> + /* KVM owns the VNCR when the vCPU isn't in a nested context. */
> + if (is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu) && (esr & ESR_ELx_VNCR))
> + return true;
> +
> + /*
> + * Determining if an external abort during a table walk happened at
> + * stage-2 is only possible with S1PTW is set. Otherwise, since KVM
> + * sets HCR_EL2.TEA, SEAs due to a stage-1 walk (i.e. accessing the PA
> + * of the stage-1 descriptor) can reach here and are reported with a
> + * TTW ESR value.
> + */
> + return esr_fsc_is_sea_ttw(esr) && (esr & ESR_ELx_S1PTW);
Should we include esr_fsc_is_secc_ttw? like
(esr_fsc_is_sea_ttw(esr) || esr_fsc_is_secc_ttw(esr)) && (esr & ESR_ELx_S1PTW)
> +}
> +
> int kvm_handle_guest_sea(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + u64 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> + u64 esr_mask = ESR_ELx_EC_MASK |
> + ESR_ELx_FnV |
> + ESR_ELx_EA |
> + ESR_ELx_CM |
> + ESR_ELx_WNR |
> + ESR_ELx_FSC;
Do you (and why) exclude ESR_ELx_IL on purpose?
BTW, if my previous statement about TTW SEA is correct, then I also
understand why we need to explicitly exclude ESR_ELx_S1PTW.
> + u64 ipa;
> +
> +
> /*
> * Give APEI the opportunity to claim the abort before handling it
> * within KVM. apei_claim_sea() expects to be called with IRQs
> @@ -1824,7 +1864,32 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_sea(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (apei_claim_sea(NULL) == 0)
I assume kvm should still lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled(), right? That
is, a WARN_ON_ONCE is still useful in case?
> return 1;
>
> - return kvm_inject_serror(vcpu);
> + if (host_owns_sea(vcpu, esr) || !test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EXIT_SEA, &kvm->arch.flags))
> + return kvm_inject_serror(vcpu);
> +
> + /* ESR_ELx.SET is RES0 when FEAT_RAS isn't implemented. */
> + if (kvm_has_ras(kvm))
> + esr_mask |= ESR_ELx_SET_MASK;
> +
> + /*
> + * Exit to userspace, and provide faulting guest virtual and physical
> + * addresses in case userspace wants to emulate SEA to guest by
> + * writing to FAR_EL1 and HPFAR_EL1 registers.
> + */
> + memset(&run->arm_sea, 0, sizeof(run->arm_sea));
> + run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA;
> + run->arm_sea.esr = esr & esr_mask;
> +
> + if (!(esr & ESR_ELx_FnV))
> + run->arm_sea.gva = kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu);
> +
> + ipa = kvm_vcpu_get_fault_ipa(vcpu);
> + if (ipa != INVALID_GPA) {
> + run->arm_sea.flags |= KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA_FLAG_GPA_VALID;
> + run->arm_sea.gpa = ipa;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index e4e566ff348b..b2cc3d74d769 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_exit {
> #define KVM_EXIT_LOONGARCH_IOCSR 38
> #define KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT 39
> #define KVM_EXIT_TDX 40
> +#define KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA 41
>
> /* For KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR */
> /* Emulate instruction failed. */
> @@ -469,6 +470,14 @@ struct kvm_run {
> } get_tdvmcall_info;
> };
> } tdx;
> + /* KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA */
> + struct {
> +#define KVM_EXIT_ARM_SEA_FLAG_GPA_VALID (1ULL << 0)
> + __u64 flags;
> + __u64 esr;
> + __u64 gva;
> + __u64 gpa;
> + } arm_sea;
> /* Fix the size of the union. */
> char padding[256];
> };
> @@ -957,6 +966,7 @@ struct kvm_enable_cap {
> #define KVM_CAP_ARM_EL2_E2H0 241
> #define KVM_CAP_RISCV_MP_STATE_RESET 242
> #define KVM_CAP_ARM_CACHEABLE_PFNMAP_SUPPORTED 243
> +#define KVM_CAP_ARM_SEA_TO_USER 244
>
> struct kvm_irq_routing_irqchip {
> __u32 irqchip;
> --
> 2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists