linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] pinctrl: qcom: use generic pin function helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me561DEHio+zN6oX9oqD6ue7z-y9E+cO_7_Z3L4taQd_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 10:43:12 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, 
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
	Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] pinctrl: qcom: use generic pin function helpers

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 8:37 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 4:39 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Use the existing infrastructure for storing and looking up pin functions
> > in pinctrl core. Remove hand-crafted callbacks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Needless to say I'm a big fan of this patch set and it seems only
> this patch 8/12 has outstanding comments.
>
> Do you think you can do a quick iteration of it or does it require
> a lot of time?
>

I don't want to rush it. Let's make it v6.18 material as I want the
changes to spend some more time in next and not break anything. It
affects literally all qualcomm platforms after all.

> I am tempted to simply apply patches 1-7 to make your life
> easier past v6.17, should I do this?
>

Yes, please, they carry no functional change, it will be less baggage
for the future.

Bart