lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1dd64ec-1c1d-444f-ac08-0cfddecdd91d@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2025 12:46:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Avoid 'schema' in subject
 and add an example

On 11/07/2025 00:44, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:58:15AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Subjects should avoid also 'schema' keyword, because all bindings are
>> supposed to be in DT schema format.  Effectively people get confused
>> that subject should not contain anything else than device name after the
>> prefix, so add a recommended example.
> 
> However, conversions should because if you say don't say schema, then 
> people will say YAML which I don't prefer. I prefer "convert foo to DT 
> schema" as lots of things are YAML and only 1 thing is "DT schema".
OK, I can rephrase the commit msg and contents. Will be longer text, though.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ