[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250713230752.GA7758@system.software.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:07:52 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org, almasrymina@...gle.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, toke@...hat.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
vishal.moola@...il.com, hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com,
jackmanb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/8] netmem: introduce utility APIs to use
struct netmem_desc
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/10/25 09:28, Byungchul Park wrote:
> ...> +
> > static inline struct net_iov *netmem_to_net_iov(netmem_ref netmem)
> > {
> > if (netmem_is_net_iov(netmem))
> > @@ -314,6 +340,21 @@ static inline netmem_ref netmem_compound_head(netmem_ref netmem)
> > return page_to_netmem(compound_head(netmem_to_page(netmem)));
> > }
> >
> > +#define nmdesc_to_page(nmdesc) (_Generic((nmdesc), \
> > + const struct netmem_desc * : (const struct page *)(nmdesc), \
> > + struct netmem_desc * : (struct page *)(nmdesc)))
>
> Considering that nmdesc is going to be separated from pages and
> accessed through indirection, and back reference to the page is
> not needed (at least for net/), this helper shouldn't even exist.
> And in fact, you don't really use it ...
> > +static inline struct netmem_desc *page_to_nmdesc(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail(page), page);
> > + return (struct netmem_desc *)page;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void *nmdesc_address(struct netmem_desc *nmdesc)
> > +{
> > + return page_address(nmdesc_to_page(nmdesc));
> > +}
>
> ... That's the only caller, and nmdesc_address() is not used, so
> just nuke both of them. This helper doesn't even make sense.
>
> Please avoid introducing functions that you don't use as a general
> rule.
I'm sorry about making you confused. I should've included another patch
using the helper like the following.
Byungchul
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
index cef9dfb877e8..adccc7c8e68f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
@@ -3266,7 +3266,7 @@ static u32 idpf_rx_hsplit_wa(const struct libeth_fqe *hdr,
struct libeth_fqe *buf, u32 data_len)
{
u32 copy = data_len <= L1_CACHE_BYTES ? data_len : ETH_HLEN;
- struct page *hdr_page, *buf_page;
+ struct netmem_desc *hdr_nmdesc, *buf_nmdesc;
const void *src;
void *dst;
@@ -3274,10 +3274,10 @@ static u32 idpf_rx_hsplit_wa(const struct libeth_fqe *hdr,
!libeth_rx_sync_for_cpu(buf, copy))
return 0;
- hdr_page = __netmem_to_page(hdr->netmem);
- buf_page = __netmem_to_page(buf->netmem);
- dst = page_address(hdr_page) + hdr->offset + hdr_page->pp->p.offset;
- src = page_address(buf_page) + buf->offset + buf_page->pp->p.offset;
+ hdr_nmdesc = __netmem_to_nmdesc(hdr->netmem);
+ buf_nmdesc = __netmem_to_nmdesc(buf->netmem);
+ dst = nmdesc_address(hdr_nmdesc) + hdr->offset + hdr_nmdesc->pp->p.offset;
+ src = nmdesc_address(buf_nmdesc) + buf->offset + buf_nmdesc->pp->p.offset;
memcpy(dst, src, LARGEST_ALIGN(copy));
buf->offset += copy;
--
> > +
> > /**
> > * __netmem_address - unsafely get pointer to the memory backing @netmem
> > * @netmem: netmem reference to get the pointer for
>
> --
> Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists