linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/mseal: always define VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0987e53e-3fd7-4e6c-847d-f7ad935c41f2@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:31:22 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
 Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/mseal: always define VM_SEALED

On 14.07.25 15:00, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> There is no reason to treat VM_SEALED in a special way, in each other case
> in which a VMA flag is unavailable due to configuration, we simply assign
> that flag to VM_NONE, make VM_SEALED consistent with all other VMA flags in
> this respect.
> 
> Additionally, use the next available bit for VM_SEALED, 42, rather than
> arbitrarily putting it at 63 and update the declaration to match all other
> VMA flags.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> ---

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb