[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250714-espionage-overexert-c12cee88d1f4@spud>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:20:02 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] docs: dt: writing-bindings: Document compatible
and filename naming
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 02:46:37PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Document established Devicetree bindings maintainers review practices:
>
> 1. Compatibles should not use bus suffixes to encode the type of
> interface, because the parent bus node defines that interface, e.g.
> "vendor,device" instead of "vendor,device-i2c" + "vendor,device-spi".
>
> 2. If the compatible represents the device as a whole, it should not
> contain the type of device in the name.
>
> 3. Filenames should match compatible. The best if match is 100%, but if
> binding has multiple compatibles, then one of the fallbacks should be
> used. Alternatively a genericish name is allowed if it follows
> "vendor,device" style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> 1. New patch
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst
> index a2d2afd099c0bd922cf12dcf49f5dffe6da748f1..e63de88385b5bc5859d8d9fca82bcf30380f3e73 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ Properties
> fallback if appropriate. SoC-specific compatibles are also preferred for
> the fallbacks.
>
> + - DON'T use bus suffixes to encode the type of interface device is using.
> + The parent bus node already implies that interface. DON'T add the type of
> + device, if the device cannot be anything else.
> +
> - DO use a vendor prefix on device-specific property names. Consider if
> properties could be common among devices of the same class. Check other
> existing bindings for similar devices.
> @@ -101,6 +105,10 @@ Typical cases and caveats
> - "syscon" is not a generic property. Use vendor and type, e.g.
> "vendor,power-manager-syscon".
>
> +- Bindings files should be named like compatible: vendor,device.yaml. In case
> + of multiple compatibles in the binding, use one of the fallbacks or a more
> + generic name, yet still matching compatible style.
> +
> Board/SoC .dts Files
> ====================
>
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists