[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250714192125.GA2414954@bhelgaas>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:21:25 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, mhi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_vpernami@...cinc.com, quic_mrana@...cinc.com,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] PCI/ASPM: Clear aspm_disable as part of
__pci_enable_link_state()
On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 03:05:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 06:00:13PM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 04:38:48PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > > @@ -1826,8 +1826,8 @@ static inline int pcie_set_target_speed(struct pci_dev *port,
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> > > int pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> > > int pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> > > -int pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state);
> >
> > AFAICT there's no caller of this at all. Why do we keep it?
>
> I'm just working on a series to convert the ath{10/11/12}k drivers to use this
> API instead of modifying LNKCTL register directly:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/pci.c#n961
Awesome! It will be great to get more of the ASPM gunk out of
drivers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists