linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 perf/core 09/22] uprobes/x86: Add uprobe syscall to speed up uprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aHV2vLQiWIbSrttH@krava>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 23:29:32 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
	Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 perf/core 09/22] uprobes/x86: Add uprobe syscall to
 speed up uprobe

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:28:01AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 05:39:15PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> 
> > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uprobe)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> > > +	unsigned long ip, sp, ax_r11_cx_ip[4];
> > > +	int err;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Allow execution only from uprobe trampolines. */
> > > +	if (!in_uprobe_trampoline(regs->ip))
> > > +		goto sigill;
> > > +
> > 
> > /*
> >  * When syscall from the trampoline, including a call to the trampoline
> >  * the stack will be shown as;
> >  *  regs->sp[0]: [rax]
> >  *          [1]: [r11]
> >  *          [2]: [rcx]
> >  *          [3]: [return-address] (probed address + sizeof(call-instruction))
> >  *
> >  * And the `&regs->sp[4]` should be the `sp` value when probe is hit.
> >  */
> > 
> > > +	err = copy_from_user(ax_r11_cx_ip, (void __user *)regs->sp, sizeof(ax_r11_cx_ip));
> > > +	if (err)
> > > +		goto sigill;
> > > +
> > > +	ip = regs->ip;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * expose the "right" values of ax/r11/cx/ip/sp to uprobe_consumer/s, plus:
> > > +	 * - adjust ip to the probe address, call saved next instruction address
> > > +	 * - adjust sp to the probe's stack frame (check trampoline code)
> > > +	 */
> > > +	regs->ax  = ax_r11_cx_ip[0];
> > > +	regs->r11 = ax_r11_cx_ip[1];
> > > +	regs->cx  = ax_r11_cx_ip[2];
> > > +	regs->ip  = ax_r11_cx_ip[3] - 5;
> > > +	regs->sp += sizeof(ax_r11_cx_ip);
> > > +	regs->orig_ax = -1;
> > > +
> 
> Would not a structure be more natural?
> 
> /*
>  * See uprobe syscall trampoline; the call to the trampoline will push
>  * the return address on the stack, the trampoline itself then pushes
>  * cx, r11 and ax.
>  */
> struct uprobe_syscall_args {
> 	unsigned long ax;
> 	unsigned long r11;
> 	unsigned long cx;
> 	unsigned long retaddr;
> };
> 
> 	err = copy_from_user(sys_args, (void __user *)regs->sp, sizeof(sys_args));
> 	if (err)
> 		goto sigill;
> 
> 	ip = regs->ip;
> 
> 	regs->ax  = sys_args->ax;
> 	regs->r11 = sys_args->r11;
> 	regs->cx  = sys_args->cx;
> 	regs->ip  = sys_args->retaddr - CALL_INSN_SIZE;
> 	regs->sp += sizeof(sys_args);
> 
> etc.. ?

I was mimicking sys_uretprobe, but using struct does seem better

thanks,
jirka