[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f623ea12-4795-4dd1-bc5e-38968ce718e0@icloud.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:42:51 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...lia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <zijun.hu@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] char: misc: Adapt and add test cases for simple
minor space division
On 2025/7/10 22:34, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> These tests will fail if applied before patch 3 "char: misc: Disallow
> registering miscdevice whose minor > MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR".
>
yes, that is expected since:
test case to expose issue may need to be sorted before fix to solve
the issue.
I ever had below observation that below patch order were reversed when
they are applied by robh finally.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241216-of_core_fix-v2-0-e69b8f60da63@quicinc.com/
[PATCH v2 1/7] of: Fix API of_find_node_opts_by_path() finding OF device
node failure
[PATCH v2 2/7] of: unittest: Add a test case for API
of_find_node_opts_by_path()
> One option is just merge the two commits.
>
> I have worked on a different option, which would be the two patches
> above,
> before applying patch 3. Then, we can either support the two different
> behaviors in the test case, or remove the support for the old behavior
> after patch 3 is applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists