[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250714-overjoyed-celadon-crocodile-4bec3a@krzk-bin>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:41:06 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] dt-bindings: media: qcom,x1e80100-camss: Assign
correct main register bank to first address
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 11:34:18AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/07/2025 11:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > On 13/07/2025 09:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 11/07/2025 14:57, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >>> The first register bank should be the 'main' register bank, in this case
> >>> the CSID wrapper register is responsible for muxing PHY/TPG inputs directly
> >>> to CSID or to other blocks such as the Sensor Front End.
> >>>
> >>> commit f4792eeaa971 ("dt-bindings: media: qcom,x1e80100-camss: Fix isp unit address")
> >>
> >> I have next from few days ago and I don't have this commit.
> >
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/linux-media/media-committers/-/commit/1da245b6b73436be0d9936bb472f8a55900193cb
> >
> >>> assigned the address to the first register bank "csid0" whereas what we
> >>> should have done is retained the unit address and moved csid_wrapper to be
> >>> the first listed bank.
> >>
> >> This is confusing. Did that commit change entries in the binding?
> > Fixed the unit address.
> >
> > What we _should_ have done is put csid_wrapper as the first entry.
>
> That's different problem then. The commit fixed only DTC warning and it
> was perfectly fine from that point of view. I would not refer it,
> because it just makes impression that commit was not correct or even
> complete.
BTW, you have here also checkpatch warnings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists