linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 wireless-next 7/7] dt-bindings: net: wireless: rt2800: add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250714-subtle-origami-gopher-c9099f@krzk-bin>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 09:27:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, 
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>, 
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 wireless-next 7/7] dt-bindings: net: wireless: rt2800:
 add

On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 02:04:48PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Add device-tree bindings for the RT2800 SOC wifi device found in older
> Ralink/Mediatek devices.

Your subject was cut. Probably you wanted something like add "Realtek foo adapter" etc.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml  | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a92aedf6ba01
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/wireless/ralink,rt2880.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Ralink RT2880 wireless device
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>
> +
> +description: |
> +  This node provides properties for configuring RT2880 SOC wifi devices.
> +  The node is expected to be specified as a root node of the device.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: ieee80211.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - ralink,rt2880-wifi
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg

Why clocks are optional? SoC devices rarely work without a clock.


Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof