[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aHS-B5KmBKX72OZc@mail.your-server.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:21:27 +0200
From: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, mazziesaccount@...il.com,
arthur.becker@...tec.com, perdaniel.olsson@...s.com,
mgonellabolduc@...onoff.com, muditsharma.info@...il.com,
clamor95@...il.com, emil.gedenryd@...s.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] iio: light: add support for veml6046x00 RGBIR
color sensor
Hi Andy,
many thanks for the thorough review. One comment below.
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> schrieb am Mo, 26. Mai 23:17:
> > +/**
> > + * struct veml6046x00_data - Private data of driver.
> > + * @regmap: Regmap definition of sensor.
> > + * @trig: Industrial-IO trigger.
> > + * @rf: Regmap field of configuration.
> > + */
> > +struct veml6046x00_data {
> > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > + struct iio_trigger *trig;
> > + struct veml6046x00_rf rf;
>
> Does pahole agree on the choice of the layout?
This is the output of pahole:
struct veml6046x00_data {
struct regmap * regmap; /* 0 4 */
struct iio_trigger * trig; /* 4 4 */
struct veml6046x00_rf rf; /* 8 20 */
/* size: 28, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* last cacheline: 28 bytes */
};
I don't see anything wrong or did i miss something?
Best regards,
Andreas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (660 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists