[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250714110413.GJ721198@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:04:13 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, shenjian15@...wei.com,
liuyonglong@...wei.com, chenhao418@...wei.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
salil.mehta@...wei.com, arnd@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 00/11] net: hns3: use seq_file for debugfs
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:04:56AM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
>
> on 2025/7/12 20:19, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 02:17:14PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote:
> > > Arnd reported that there are two build warning for on-stasck
> > > buffer oversize. As Arnd's suggestion, using seq file way
> > > to avoid the stack buffer or kmalloc buffer allocating.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > ChangeLog:
> > > v1 -> v2:
> > > - Remove unused functions in advance to eliminate compilation warnings, suggested by Jakub Kicinski
> > > - Remove unnecessary cast, suggested by Andrew Lunn
> > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250708130029.1310872-1-shaojijie@huawei.com/
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Jian Shen (5):
> > > net: hns3: clean up the build warning in debugfs by use seq file
> > > net: hns3: use seq_file for files in queue/ in debugfs
> > > net: hns3: use seq_file for files in tm/ in debugfs
> > > net: hns3: use seq_file for files in tx_bd_info/ and rx_bd_info/ in
> > > debugfs
> > Thanks for the update, but unfortunately I don't think this is enough.
> >
> > W=1 builds with bouth Clang 20.1.7 and GCC 15.1.0 warn that
> > hns3_dbg_fops is unused with the patch (10/11) above applied.
> >
> > > net: hns3: remove the unused code after using seq_file
> > I suspect this patch (11/11) needs to be squashed into the previous one (10/11).
> >
> > ...
>
> Yes, it looks like so...
>
> However, in this case, the operation of patch10 is not singular.
> It modified a debugfs file through a patch while also removing unused code frameworks.
>
> In fact, this warning was cleared in patch 11...
>
> ...
>
> I will merge patch 11 into patch 10 in v3.
Thanks, I agree that looks like a good approach.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists