[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250714125055.kqp3dNm1@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:50:55 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] verification/rvgen: Support the 'next' operator
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 02:48:04PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> RULE = always (((not SCHEDULING) and (next SCHEDULING)) imply (next next SWITCH))
Btw, I think this "(not X) and (next X)" seems very useful. So we could
define a helper for this, perhaps something like "rising_edge".
Nam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists