linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/7] netmem: introduce struct netmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <92073822-ab60-40ca-9ff5-a41119c0ad3d@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:24:02 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>, willy@...radead.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 kernel_team@...ynix.com, almasrymina@...gle.com,
 ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, hawk@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
 asml.silence@...il.com, toke@...hat.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
 ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, david@...hat.com,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
 surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, vishal.moola@...il.com,
 hannes@...xchg.org, ziy@...dia.com, jackmanb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/7] netmem: introduce struct netmem_desc
 mirroring struct page

On 7/14/25 11:42, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 04:45:08PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Thanks a lot, this clarifies things for me.
> 
> You're welcome :)
> 
>> Unfortunately, I still think that it's hard to judge patches 1 and 7 
>> in context limited to this series, so let's proceed to reposting just
>> the "middle 5" patches.
> 
> Could you please share your thoughts on why it's hard to judge them and
> what's missing from the series, such as in the comments, changelog, or
> the cover letter?

I think we moved on in the discussion since then? "middle 5" patches are now
merged, and 1+7 was, along with more patches (that make the context less
limited hopefully), posted as v9/v10 now?