lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cd81800-12ba-460e-ac28-4532d0be1ec9@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 06:54:50 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
 "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
 "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
 "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "Mallick, Asit K"
 <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
 "Scarlata, Vincent R" <vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com>,
 "Cai, Chong" <chongc@...gle.com>, "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
 "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
 "dionnaglaze@...gle.com" <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
 "Bondarevska, Nataliia" <bondarn@...gle.com>,
 "Raynor, Scott" <scott.raynor@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] x86/sgx: Enable automatic SVN updates for SGX
 enclaves

On 7/14/25 00:35, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> I think you put it: this would require a spinlock in the fast path and
> *in theory* if we are running many many concurrent enclaves can create 
> contention

FWIW, my mental model is that spinlocks that are held for short periods
of time are pretty much the same cost as an atomic under contention.

If there are lots of users, the cost of moving the cacheline for the
atomic or the spinlock dominates everything else. It doesn't matter
whether that cacheline is an atomic_t or spinlock_t.

The only difference is that there is _visible_ spinning for a spinlock.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ