lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DBCPB0BHKNTQ.K0NWNXIFKCT0@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:33:22 +0200
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Vitaly Wool" <vitaly.wool@...sulko.se>, "Kent Overstreet"
 <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@...il.com>,
 "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
 <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "Lorenzo Stoakes"
 <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
 <linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "Herbert Xu"
 <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>, "Pedro
 Falcato" <pfalcato@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/4] mm/slub: allow to set node and align in
 k[v]realloc

Hi Kent,

On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 3:58 PM CEST, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/darray.c b/fs/bcachefs/darray.c
> index e86d36d23e9e..928e83a1ce42 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/darray.c
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/darray.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ int __bch2_darray_resize_noprof(darray_char *d, size_t element_size, size_t new_
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  		void *data = likely(bytes < INT_MAX)
> -			? kvmalloc_noprof(bytes, gfp)
> +			? kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(bytes, 1, gfp, NUMA_NO_NODE)
>  			: vmalloc_noprof(bytes);
>  		if (!data)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/util.h b/fs/bcachefs/util.h
> index 0a4b1d433621..2d6d4b547db8 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/util.h
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/util.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void *bch2_kvmalloc_noprof(size_t n, gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	void *p = unlikely(n >= INT_MAX)
>  		? vmalloc_noprof(n)
> -		: kvmalloc_noprof(n, flags & ~__GFP_ZERO);
> +		: kvmalloc_node_align_noprof(n, 1, flags & ~__GFP_ZERO, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  	if (p && (flags & __GFP_ZERO))
>  		memset(p, 0, n);
>  	return p;

I assume this is because kvmalloc(), and hence kvrealloc(), does this:

	/* Don't even allow crazy sizes */
	if (unlikely(size > INT_MAX)) {
		WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
		return NULL;
	}

Do we still consider this a "crazy size"? :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ