[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17efdc2b3e206730cfbef410fc89a713da133b65.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:24:11 +0200
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>, Clark
Williams <williams@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/17] rv: Fix generated files going over 100 column
limit
On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 17:08 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 09:14:27AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > The dot2c.py script generates all states in a single line. This
> > breaks the
> > 100 column limit when the state machines are non-trivial.
> > Recent changes allow it to print states over multiple lines if the
> > resulting line would have been too long.
> >
> > Adapt existing monitors with line length over the limit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sco/sco.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> > kernel/trace/rv/monitors/snep/snep.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > kernel/trace/rv/monitors/snroc/snroc.h | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sco/sco.h
> > b/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sco/sco.h
> > index 7a4c1f2d5ca1c..83ca9a03331af 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sco/sco.h
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sco/sco.h
> > @@ -39,8 +39,16 @@ static const struct automaton_sco automaton_sco
> > = {
> > "schedule_exit"
> > },
> > .function = {
> > - { thread_context_sco,
> > scheduling_context_sco, INVALID_STATE },
> > - { INVALID_STATE,
> > INVALID_STATE, thread_context_sco },
> > + {
> > + thread_context_sco,
> > + scheduling_context_sco,
> > + INVALID_STATE
> > + },
> > + {
> > + INVALID_STATE,
> > + INVALID_STATE,
> > + thread_context_sco
> > + },
>
> I'm confused, these lines were not over 100 columns. Same for snroc.
>
> From my understanding of the previous patch, the script does not
> break
> lines which are not over the limit. Did I miss something?
Right, I didn't make it obvious in the commit description since I
thought it wasn't too important.
Those are the monitors whose lines are going to be longer than 100
columns later in the series.
Changing it there saves a bit of complication in the next patches,
where I only add lines for new events instead of splitting the line
/and/ adding the events.
Do you think I should mention this in the commit description?
Thanks,
Gabriele
Powered by blists - more mailing lists