lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4aefce95-0029-49d1-99d2-c132406ec84f@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 11:19:05 -0700
From: "Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita"
 <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
 Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
 "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
 Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>,
 Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>,
 Ying Huang <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
 Yao Xingtao <yaoxt.fnst@...itsu.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
 Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
 Benjamin Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>,
 PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>,
 Zhijian Li <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] cxl/dax: Defer DAX consumption of SOFT RESERVED
 resources until after CXL region creation

Hi Alison,

Sorry I missed this email before sending out v5. Comments inline.

On 7/15/2025 9:27 AM, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 10:19:49PM +0000, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
>> From: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>
>>
>> The DAX HMEM driver currently consumes all SOFT RESERVED iomem resources
>> during initialization. This interferes with the CXL driver’s ability to
>> create regions and trim overlapping SOFT RESERVED ranges before DAX uses
>> them.
>>
>> To resolve this, defer the DAX driver's resource consumption if the
>> cxl_acpi driver is enabled. The DAX HMEM initialization skips walking the
>> iomem resource tree in this case. After CXL region creation completes,
>> any remaining SOFT RESERVED resources are explicitly registered with the
>> DAX driver by the CXL driver.
>>
>> This sequencing ensures proper handling of overlaps and fixes hotplug
>> failures.
> 
> Hi Smita,
> 
> About the issue I first mentioned here [1]. The HMEM driver is not
> waiting for region probe to finish. By the time region probe attempts
> to hand off the memory to DAX, the memory is already marked as System RAM.
> 
> See 'case CXL_PARTMODE_RAM:' in cxl_region_probe(). The is_system_ram()
> test fails so devm_cxl_add_dax_region() not possible.
> 
> This means that in appearance, just looking at /proc/iomem/, this
> seems to have worked. There is no soft reserved and the dax and
> kmem resources are child resources of the region resource. But they
> were not set up by the region driver, hence no unregister callback
> is triggered when the region is disabled.

I believe this should be resolved in v5. I see the following dmesg 
entries indicating that devm_cxl_add_dax_region() is being called 
successfully for all regions:

# dmesg | grep devm_cxl_add_dax_region
[   40.730864] devm_cxl_add_dax_region: cxl_region region0: region0: 
register dax_region0
[   40.756307] devm_cxl_add_dax_region: cxl_region region1: region1: 
register dax_region1
[   43.689882] devm_cxl_add_dax_region: cxl_region region2: region2: 
register dax_region2

cat /proc/iomem

850000000-284fffffff : CXL Window 0
   850000000-284fffffff : region0
     850000000-284fffffff : dax0.0
       850000000-284fffffff : System RAM (kmem)
2850000000-484fffffff : CXL Window 1
   2850000000-484fffffff : region1
     2850000000-484fffffff : dax1.0
       2850000000-484fffffff : System RAM (kmem)
4850000000-684fffffff : CXL Window 2
   4850000000-684fffffff : region2
     4850000000-684fffffff : dax2.0
       4850000000-684fffffff : System RAM (kmem)

I suspect devm_cxl_add_dax_region() didn't execute in v4 because 
hmem_register_resource() (called from hmat.c) preemptively created 
hmem_active entries. These were consumed during walk_hmem_resources() 
and registered by hmem_register_device() before the CXL region probe 
could complete.

In v5, if CONFIG_CXL_ACPI is enabled, soft reserved resources are stored 
in hmem_deferred_active instead and hmem_register_resource() calls from 
hmat.c are disabled. This ensures DAX registration happens only through 
CXL drivers probing.

> 
> It appears like this:
> 
> c080000000-17dbfffffff : CXL Window 0
>    c080000000-c47fffffff : region2
>      c080000000-c47fffffff : dax0.0
>        c080000000-c47fffffff : System RAM (kmem)
> 
> Now, to make the memory available for reuse, need to do:
> # daxctl offline-memory dax0.0
> # daxctl destroy-device --force dax0.0
> # cxl disable-region 2
> # cxl destroy-region 2
> 
> Whereas previously, did this:
> # daxctl offline-memory dax0.0
> # cxl disable-region 2
>    After disabling region, dax device unregistered.
> # cxl destroy-region 2

I haven’t yet tested this specific unregister flow with v5. I’ll verify 
and follow up if I see any issues. Meanwhile, please let me know if you 
still observe the same behavior or need additional debug info from my side.

Thanks
Smita
> 
> I do see that __cxl_region_softreserv_update() is not called until
> after cxl_region_probe() completes, so that is waiting properly to
> pick up the scraps. I'm actually not sure there would be any scraps
> though, if the HMEM driver has already done it's thing. In my case
> the Soft Reserved size is same as region, so I cannot tell what
> would happen if that Soft Reserved had more capacity than the region.
> 
> If I do this: # CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM is not set, works same as before,
> which is as expected.
> 
> Let me know if I can try anything else out or collect more info.
> 
> --Alison
> 
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/nvdimm/20250603221949.53272-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com/T/#m10c0eb7b258af7cd0c84c7ee2c417c055724f921
> 
> 
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Nathan Fontenot <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>
>> Co-developed-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cxl/core/region.c | 10 +++++++++
>>   drivers/dax/hmem/device.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>   drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c   |  3 ++-
>>   include/linux/dax.h       |  6 ++++++
>>   4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> index 3a5ca44d65f3..c6c0c7ba3b20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/sort.h>
>>   #include <linux/idr.h>
>>   #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
>> +#include <linux/dax.h>
>>   #include <cxlmem.h>
>>   #include <cxl.h>
>>   #include "core.h"
>> @@ -3553,6 +3554,11 @@ static struct resource *normalize_resource(struct resource *res)
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int cxl_softreserv_mem_register(struct resource *res, void *unused)
>> +{
>> +	return hmem_register_device(phys_to_target_node(res->start), res);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __cxl_region_softreserv_update(struct resource *soft,
>>   					  void *_cxlr)
>>   {
>> @@ -3590,6 +3596,10 @@ int cxl_region_softreserv_update(void)
>>   				    __cxl_region_softreserv_update);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/* Now register any remaining SOFT RESERVES with DAX */
>> +	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>> +			    0, -1, NULL, cxl_softreserv_mem_register);
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_region_softreserv_update, "CXL");
>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
>> index 59ad44761191..cc1ed7bbdb1a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
>> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
>>   static bool nohmem;
>>   module_param_named(disable, nohmem, bool, 0444);
>>   
>> -static bool platform_initialized;
>>   static DEFINE_MUTEX(hmem_resource_lock);
>>   static struct resource hmem_active = {
>>   	.name = "HMEM devices",
>> @@ -35,9 +34,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_hmem_resources);
>>   
>>   static void __hmem_register_resource(int target_nid, struct resource *res)
>>   {
>> -	struct platform_device *pdev;
>>   	struct resource *new;
>> -	int rc;
>>   
>>   	new = __request_region(&hmem_active, res->start, resource_size(res), "",
>>   			       0);
>> @@ -47,21 +44,6 @@ static void __hmem_register_resource(int target_nid, struct resource *res)
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	new->desc = target_nid;
>> -
>> -	if (platform_initialized)
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	pdev = platform_device_alloc("hmem_platform", 0);
>> -	if (!pdev) {
>> -		pr_err_once("failed to register device-dax hmem_platform device\n");
>> -		return;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	rc = platform_device_add(pdev);
>> -	if (rc)
>> -		platform_device_put(pdev);
>> -	else
>> -		platform_initialized = true;
>>   }
>>   
>>   void hmem_register_resource(int target_nid, struct resource *res)
>> @@ -83,9 +65,28 @@ static __init int hmem_register_one(struct resource *res, void *data)
>>   
>>   static __init int hmem_init(void)
>>   {
>> -	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED,
>> -			IORESOURCE_MEM, 0, -1, NULL, hmem_register_one);
>> -	return 0;
>> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>> +	int rc;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CXL_ACPI)) {
>> +		walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED,
>> +				    IORESOURCE_MEM, 0, -1, NULL,
>> +				    hmem_register_one);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	pdev = platform_device_alloc("hmem_platform", 0);
>> +	if (!pdev) {
>> +		pr_err("failed to register device-dax hmem_platform device\n");
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rc = platform_device_add(pdev);
>> +	if (rc) {
>> +		pr_err("failed to add device-dax hmem_platform device\n");
>> +		platform_device_put(pdev);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return rc;
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
>> index 3aedef5f1be1..a206b9b383e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c
>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void release_hmem(void *pdev)
>>   	platform_device_unregister(pdev);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int hmem_register_device(int target_nid, const struct resource *res)
>> +int hmem_register_device(int target_nid, const struct resource *res)
>>   {
>>   	struct device *host = &dax_hmem_pdev->dev;
>>   	struct platform_device *pdev;
>> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static int hmem_register_device(int target_nid, const struct resource *res)
>>   	platform_device_put(pdev);
>>   	return rc;
>>   }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hmem_register_device);
>>   
>>   static int dax_hmem_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
>> index a4ad3708ea35..5052dca8b3bc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dax.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dax.h
>> @@ -299,10 +299,16 @@ static inline int dax_mem2blk_err(int err)
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM_DEVICES
>>   void hmem_register_resource(int target_nid, struct resource *r);
>> +int hmem_register_device(int target_nid, const struct resource *res);
>>   #else
>>   static inline void hmem_register_resource(int target_nid, struct resource *r)
>>   {
>>   }
>> +
>> +static inline int hmem_register_device(int target_nid, const struct resource *res)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   typedef int (*walk_hmem_fn)(int target_nid, const struct resource *res);
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ