linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: functioni: Fix a oob problem in rndis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tencent_AC052534ED0C97ED96CDBF2269E71DAE5905@qq.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:20:09 +0800
From: jackysliu <1972843537@...com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: 1972843537@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: functioni: Fix a oob problem in rndis

On Fri, Jul 11 2025 08:51:30 +0200, greg k-h wrote:

>Yes, and then look to see what buf_len (not buflen) in
>gen_ndis_set_resp() is used for.  I'll wait... :)
Oh,my bad.It seem that buf_len will only be used for some debugging code..

>What tool generated this static analysis?  You always have to mention
>that as per our development rules.
The vulnerability is found by  is found by Wukong-Agent, a code security AI agent,
 through static code analysis.But It seems that this is a false positive..

>And what qemu setup did you use to test this?  That would be helpful to
>know so that I can verify it on my end.

I've add some web-usb device to test this model.But seems that I went into a wrong way.

I'll double check my commit in the future
Thanks for your time

Siyang Liu