[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60cf7590-4fd8-419b-a782-8bc89fb5395a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:54:30 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>
To: Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com, hao.yao@...el.com,
mehdi.djait@...ux.intel.com, dongcheng.yan@...ux.intel.com,
hverkuil@...all.nl, krzk@...nel.org, dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com, jai.luthra@...asonboard.com,
tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benjamin.chan@....com, bin.du@....com, grosikop@....com, king.li@....com,
dantony@....com, vengutta@....com, Phil.Jawich@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: i2c: Add OV05C10 camera sensor driver
On 14/07/2025 21:51, Pratap Nirujogi wrote:
> + ret = ov05c10_init_controls(ov05c10);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(ov05c10->dev, "fail to init ov05c10 ctl %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_pm;
> + }
I would expect to see an "identify_module()" function here, something
similar to ov02c10.
ret = ov02c10_power_on(&client->dev);
if (ret) {
dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "failed to power on\n");
return ret;
}
ret = ov02c10_identify_module(ov02c10);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to find sensor: %d", ret);
goto probe_error_power_off;
}
ret = ov02c10_init_controls(ov02c10);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to init controls: %d", ret);
goto probe_error_v4l2_ctrl_handler_free;
}
Standard practice is to try to talk to the sensor in probe() and bug out
if you can't.
With your current logic, the first time you'd realise no sensor was
present or is in reset etc is the first time you try to stream I think..
Definitely a good idea to probe for your sensor in probe failing the
probe if you can't find the hardware.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists