lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c804f4bf-3257-4e6a-b95b-ce6768854521@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:39:02 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
 Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, leo.yan@....com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] perf: arm_spe: Add support for FEAT_SPE_EFT
 extended filtering



On 14/07/2025 2:46 pm, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 11:49:01AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> FEAT_SPE_EFT (optional from Armv9.4) adds mask bits for the existing
>> load, store and branch filters. It also adds two new filter bits for
>> SIMD and floating point with their own associated mask bits. The current
>> filters only allow OR filtering on samples that are load OR store etc,
>> and the new mask bits allow setting part of the filter to an AND, for
>> example filtering samples that are store AND SIMD. With mask bits set to
>> 0, the OR behavior is preserved, so the unless any masks are explicitly
>> set old filters will behave the same.
>>
>> Add them all and make them behave the same way as existing format bits,
>> hidden and return EOPNOTSUPP if set when the feature doesn't exist.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
>> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> index d9f6d229dce8..9309b846f642 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu {
>>   #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND			(1UL << 5)
>>   #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT		(1UL << 6)
>>   #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD			(1UL << 7)
>> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT			(1UL << 8)
>>   #define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED			(1UL << 63)
>>   	u64					features;
>>   
>> @@ -197,6 +198,27 @@ static const struct attribute_group arm_spe_pmu_cap_group = {
>>   #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_CFG		config	/* PMBLIMITR_EL1.FM = DISCARD */
>>   #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_LO			35
>>   #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_discard_HI			35
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_branch_filter_mask_CFG	config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.Bm */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_branch_filter_mask_LO	36
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_branch_filter_mask_HI	36
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_load_filter_mask_CFG	config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.LDm */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_load_filter_mask_LO	37
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_load_filter_mask_HI	37
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_mask_CFG	config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.STm */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_mask_LO	38
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_store_filter_mask_HI	38
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_simd_filter_CFG		config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.SIMD */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_simd_filter_LO		39
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_simd_filter_HI		39
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_simd_filter_mask_CFG	config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.SIMDm */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_simd_filter_mask_LO	40
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_simd_filter_mask_HI	40
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_float_filter_CFG		config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.FP */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_float_filter_LO		41
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_float_filter_HI		41
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_float_filter_mask_CFG	config	/* PMSFCR_EL1.FPm */
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_float_filter_mask_LO	42
>> +#define ATTR_CFG_FLD_float_filter_mask_HI	42
>>   
>>   #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_event_filter_CFG		config1	/* PMSEVFR_EL1 */
>>   #define ATTR_CFG_FLD_event_filter_LO		0
>> @@ -215,8 +237,15 @@ GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pa_enable);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pct_enable);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(jitter);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(branch_filter);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(branch_filter_mask);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(load_filter);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(load_filter_mask);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(store_filter_mask);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(simd_filter);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(simd_filter_mask);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(float_filter);
>> +GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(float_filter_mask);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event_filter);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(inv_event_filter);
>>   GEN_PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(min_latency);
>> @@ -228,8 +257,15 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_formats_attr[] = {
>>   	&format_attr_pct_enable.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_jitter.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_branch_filter.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_branch_filter_mask.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_load_filter.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_load_filter_mask.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_store_filter.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_store_filter_mask.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_simd_filter.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_simd_filter_mask.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_float_filter.attr,
>> +	&format_attr_float_filter_mask.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_event_filter.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr,
>>   	&format_attr_min_latency.attr,
>> @@ -250,6 +286,16 @@ static umode_t arm_spe_pmu_format_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>>   	if (attr == &format_attr_inv_event_filter.attr && !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT))
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>> +	if ((attr == &format_attr_branch_filter_mask.attr ||
>> +	     attr == &format_attr_load_filter_mask.attr ||
>> +	     attr == &format_attr_store_filter_mask.attr ||
>> +	     attr == &format_attr_simd_filter.attr ||
>> +	     attr == &format_attr_simd_filter_mask.attr ||
>> +	     attr == &format_attr_float_filter.attr ||
>> +	     attr == &format_attr_float_filter_mask.attr) &&
>> +	     !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>>   	return attr->mode;
>>   }
>>   
>> @@ -341,8 +387,15 @@ static u64 arm_spe_event_to_pmsfcr(struct perf_event *event)
>>   	u64 reg = 0;
>>   
>>   	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_LD, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, load_filter));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_LDm, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, load_filter_mask));
>>   	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_ST, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, store_filter));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_STm, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, store_filter_mask));
>>   	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_B, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, branch_filter));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_Bm, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, branch_filter_mask));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_SIMD, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, simd_filter));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_SIMDm, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, simd_filter_mask));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_FP, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, float_filter));
>> +	reg |= FIELD_PREP(PMSFCR_EL1_FPm, ATTR_CFG_GET_FLD(attr, float_filter_mask));
>>   
>>   	if (reg)
>>   		reg |= PMSFCR_EL1_FT;
>> @@ -716,6 +769,10 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>>   	u64 reg;
>>   	struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
>>   	struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = to_spe_pmu(event->pmu);
>> +	const u64 feat_spe_eft_bits = PMSFCR_EL1_LDm | PMSFCR_EL1_STm |
>> +				      PMSFCR_EL1_Bm | PMSFCR_EL1_SIMD |
>> +				      PMSFCR_EL1_SIMDm | PMSFCR_EL1_FP |
>> +				      PMSFCR_EL1_FPm;
> 
> I'm not sure this constant is adding much, especially as its defined
> quite a long way from its single user.
> 
>>   
>>   	/* This is, of course, deeply driver-specific */
>>   	if (attr->type != event->pmu->type)
>> @@ -761,6 +818,10 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>>   	    !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT))
>>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>   
>> +	if ((reg & feat_spe_eft_bits) &&
>> +	    !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT))
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> You could probably just spell out the entire thing tbh. It's verbose,
> but it's also pretty clear and it means we have everything in one place:
> 
> 	if ((FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_LDm, reg) ||
> 	     FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_STm, reg) ||
> 	     FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_Bm, reg) ||
> 	     FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_SIMD, reg) ||
> 	     FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_SIMDm, reg) ||
> 	     FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FP, reg) ||
> 	     FIELD_GET(PMSFCR_EL1_FPm, reg)) &&
>             !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT))
> 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> Will

Ack


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ