[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B0B7369E-2D65-4FD3-A1C9-2701FB455019@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 15:12:34 -0400
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...delbit.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <k.shutemov@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: refactor after-split (page) cache code.
On 16 Jul 2025, at 13:59, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 01:11:12PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
>> Smatch/coverity checkers report NULL mapping referencing issues[1][2][3]
>> every time the code is modified, because they do not understand that
>> mapping cannot be NULL when a folio is in page cache in the code.
>> Refactor the code to make it explicit.
>>
>> No functional change is intended.
>>
>> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/2afe3d59-aca5-40f7-82a3-a6d976fb0f4f@stanley.mountain/
>> [2]https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild/64b54034-f311-4e7d-b935-c16775dbb642@suswa.mountain/
>> [3]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250716145804.4836-1-antonio@mandelbit.com/
>>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>> ---
>
> This silences the Smatch warning. :)
Thank you for the confirmation.
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists